Saturday, July 19, 2025

“From Punishment to Possibility: Rethinking Education through Sitare Zameen Par”

 Hello Everyone! 



      This blog is written as part of our Thinking activity on film review, this task assigned by Megha Trivedi Ma’am. After reading the short story “Crime and Punishment” by R.K. Narayan, which explores the rigid education system and the dynamics between a child and a teacher, we watched the film "Sitare Zameen Par". This reflective blog attempts to compare both works and explore how they differ in tone, message, and emotional impact, also comparing both narratives and exploring themes such as the education system, parenting, and the responsibilities of teachers.



Sitare Zameen Par


👉🏻    This blog aims to explore and reflect upon:


  1. How the movie Sitare Zameen Par portrays the education system

  2. The message it conveys about the role of teachers and parents

  3. Its comparison with the short story Crime and Punishment

  4. My personal feelings and learnings after watching the movie



1. How does the movie portray the education system?

Sitare Zameen Par paints a deeply moving and honest picture of the modern Indian education system, and more importantly, its harsh realities. The film's young protagonist, a boy with immense artistic talent, is constantly ridiculed and punished for not performing well in school. His struggles with conventional learning methods are misunderstood as laziness or disobedience. The school, rather than trying to understand him, becomes a place of fear and humiliation.


In movie, the education system is shown as a mirror of today’s academic culture—competitive, mechanical, and often emotionally detached. The film boldly brings to light the gaps between what children need and what the system provides.

Here are the key ways the movie reflects our current system:

a) Overemphasis on Academics

  • The film criticizes the pressure to perform, score, and succeed as per predefined metrics.

  • Children are judged by grades, not growth.

  • Example: Gulshan, a teacher himself, once echoed the pressure-filled mindset.

    • Dialogue: “Jeetne wale ko hi sab yaad rakhte hain. Baaki toh sirf number hote hain.”
      (Only winners are remembered. The rest are just numbers.) 

    • This reflects a harsh truth of modern schooling—success is measured in ranks, not resilience.

 b) Neglect of Emotional and Mental Health

  • The movie shows how the system often fails to acknowledge behavioral disorders or emotional needs.

  • A child struggling emotionally is often misunderstood as being “undisciplined” or “lazy.”

  • Dialogue: “Unka dimaag normal nahi hai… toh unka school bhi alag hona chahiye?”
    (Their minds are not ‘normal’... so should their schools also be separate?)

    • 👉 This line questions the stigmatization of neurodiverse children in mainstream schools.

c) Lack of Inclusivity and Flexibility

  • Schools in the film are shown to follow rigid rules, offering little space for creativity, play, or individuality.

  • Children are expected to fit into molds instead of being nurtured as individuals.

  • Visual Example: The classroom scene where Gulshan initially mocks and scolds the children, highlighting how many educators are conditioned to seek obedience over understanding.

d) Reflection of Real-World Schooling Today

  • In the real world, children with autism, ADHD, or learning disabilities are often punished for behavior they can’t control, rather than being supported.

  • Many parents and teachers still lack awareness of neurodiversity, leading to emotional trauma for the child.

  • This is where the movie becomes a strong wake-up call for educational reform.

🔹 A Moment of Realization

  • Gulshan’s character evolves through the story, and the shift in his tone reflects a deep learning.

  • He later says:

    “Agar maine unki duniya nahi samjhi, toh mera sikhaana kya kaam ka?”
    (If I don’t understand their world, what’s the use of my teaching?)


The movie explores how rote learning, memorization, and examination pressure dominate school life. There’s little or no space for creative expression, emotional intelligence, or personalized learning. Children who think differently are often pushed aside, labelled failures, and robbed of their confidence.

One impactful scene is when the teacher says:

“Har bachcha special hota hai.” (Every child is special.)
This line becomes a turning point not just in the film, but in how we perceive education itself.

In contrast, R.K. Narayan’s “Crime and Punishment” shows a boy being physically punished by his private tutor for not remembering arithmetic. This reflects a more traditional style of teaching, where obedience was expected without question, and punishment was accepted as a tool for improvement.

Together, both the story and the film expose how punitive, fear-based education fails to bring out a child’s true potential. The film, however, goes beyond criticism—it proposes a better, more humane alternative.


2. What message does the movie give about the role of teachers and parents?

The film offers a strong and clear message: teachers and parents hold immense power in shaping not just a child's intellect, but also their confidence, identity, and emotional health.

At first, the parents in the movie are shown as well-meaning but ignorant. They see their son’s poor academic performance as a threat to his future. In a heartbreaking scene, the father says:

“Mujhe uski har report card par sirf red marks hi dikhte hain.”
(“All I ever see on his report card are red marks.”)
This shows how parents sometimes reduce their child to grades, forgetting that there is a living, feeling human being behind those marks.

Similarly, the teachers in his earlier school also fail him. They insult him publicly, call him “lazy” and “dumb,” and even recommend boarding school as a form of punishment. This reflects a toxic culture where empathy is replaced with authority.

However, when the new teacher (played with warmth and depth) enters the scene, things begin to change. He recognizes the child’s silence as a cry for help, not as disobedience. Through patience, storytelling, and painting exercises, he builds a bridge of trust.

He says to his fellow teachers:


“Aap logon ne uske report card pe likhe numbers padhe, uski aankhon mein chhupi kahani nahi padhi.”
(“You read the numbers on his report card, but not the story hidden in his eyes.”)

This single line sums up the movie’s core belief:
The best educators are not those who teach well, but those who understand deeply.


One of the most striking elements of Sitare Zameen Par is its honest and emotional portrayal of neurodivergent children. The film sheds light on how the education system often overlooks the emotional and psychological needs of students who don’t conform to conventional learning patterns. It calls for a shift in how we perceive intelligence and success, encouraging both educators and parents to prioritize empathy over performance. A powerful line in the film, “Bachpan ka matlab sirf marks nahi hota… khushi bhi hoti hai”, sums up this sentiment perfectly—it emphasizes that childhood should be about joy, curiosity, and self-discovery, not just grades and achievements.


A beautifully written article titled “Sitaare Zameen Par: A Neurodiversity Lesson for Parents” echoes this message. It discusses how the film serves as a mirror for parents and teachers, urging them to look beyond academic performance and appreciate the uniqueness of every child. The article highlights the importance of shifting from a result-driven mindset to one of understanding and unconditional support. Just like the film, the blog reminds us that children are not problems to be solved, but people to be nurtured—with patience, love, and acceptance.







In this Movie Sitare Zameen Par shows that true teachers and parents must understand a child’s world instead of forcing them to fit into society’s expectations. Gulshan Kumar, who starts off as a strict and traditional teacher, gradually transforms when he sees the emotional struggles of neurodivergent children. He learns to empathize, support, and celebrate their uniqueness.

By the end, he becomes an ideal teacher—not one who teaches from books, but from the heart. His change inspires us to look beyond marks and behavior.


"A good teacher believes in the child even when the world doesn’t."

 

3. How does it compare with R.K. Narayan’s story “Crime and Punishment”?

While both the film and the story deal with a child’s struggle under pressure, their tone and conclusions are quite different.

In Crime and Punishment, R.K. Narayan presents a small boy being physically punished by a private tutor who believes that strict discipline will improve performance. The child, however, responds with clever lies and excuses to avoid being beaten. The story ends with the tutor feeling helpless and defeated, realizing that punishment has not worked. But there’s no resolution—just a sense of failure and silence.

In contrast, Sitare Zameen Par takes the same core issue—misunderstood children—and shows a positive, healing alternative. Instead of leaving the child broken or fearful, the film offers hope. The sensitive teacher chooses connection over control, guiding the boy toward self-acceptance and academic progress through alternative learning techniques.

While Narayan’s story reveals the problem, the film offers the solution.

Here’s a comparative summary:


AspectCrime and PunishmentSitare Zameen Par
ToneIronical, unresolvedEmotional, transformative
Adult AuthorityPunitive tutorCompassionate teacher
ResolutionChild becomes manipulativeChild gains confidence
MessagePunishment failsEmpathy heals



👉🏻   And here, literature and cinema have long served as mirrors to society, exposing its blind spots while offering pathways to change. R. K. Narayan’s short story Crime and Punishment and the film Sitare Zameen Par (2024) may appear different in form and tone, but both center around children who are misunderstood and mishandled by adults in power. These works compel us to reflect on how deeply flawed systems—whether in schools or training academies—can harm young minds when led by ego and misunderstanding instead of empathy.

Let’s explore their similarities and differences in detail:

 1. Central Theme: Adult Control vs. Child Autonomy

  • In Narayan’s story, a young teacher tries to enforce obedience through strict punishment. The boy under his care becomes a passive victim at first, but soon finds clever ways to challenge his teacher’s authority.

  • In the film, Coach Gulshan similarly uses rigid control, shouting instructions, and mocking his differently-abled students when they cannot perform like “normal” children.

Both works critique how adults try to “fix” children rather than understand them. The theme of authority misused is central in both.


 2. Representation of the Child

  • Narayan’s boy is naughty, clever, and rebellious, but he is still a product of his environment. His behavior reflects a response to being punished rather than guided.

  • The children in Sitare Zameen Par are innocent and neurodiverse, not naughty. They are trapped in bodies or minds that learn differently, and their struggles are misunderstood as laziness or weakness.B

Both sets of children are judged unfairly, and both are more emotionally intelligent than the adults handling them.


 3. Adult Authority Figures and Their Ego

  • The teacher in the short story sees himself as morally superior and intellectually dominant. His pride is hurt when the child outwits him.

  • Gulshan, in the movie, carries the burden of his own athletic past. He feels insulted when the students can’t follow his drills. He mocks them publicly, especially when one of them drops the ball or fails to jump.

In both narratives, adult ego blocks emotional connection. The need to feel in control leads to emotional and moral failure.


4. Discipline vs. Empathy: Two Different Approaches

  • Narayan’s teacher uses physical punishment and sarcastic remarks to control behavior. His methods are outdated but culturally familiar.

  • Gulshan’s coaching starts similarly—with loud whistles, name-calling, and frustration. However, over time, he watches the children closely and begins to connect with them. When one child is scared to jump into the pool, Gulshan chooses to sit quietly beside him instead of yelling.

This is where the difference begins—Narayan’s story stops at failure; the movie moves toward emotional repair.


 5. Learning and Growth: Who Learns More?

  • In the story, the teacher learns nothing. Even when the boy manipulates him and exposes his weakness, the teacher blames the system and clings to pride.

  • In the movie, Gulshan changes completely. He learns that “real training begins when ego ends.” He stops seeing children as problems to solve and begins to celebrate their small victories—like tying shoelaces or dribbling the ball once.

In short, the movie allows the adult to evolve; the story shows an adult stuck in his rigid mindset.


 6. Narrative Style and Tone

  • Narayan’s story uses humor, irony, and satire to make the reader see how ridiculous and outdated some teaching methods are.

  • The film uses emotion, music, visuals, and silence to create a slow and powerful transformation in both the coach and audience.

One makes you think with a smile; the other makes you feel with a tear.


7. Power Dynamics: Shifting or Static?

  • The story ends with the child gaining upper hand—not through respect, but by outsmarting the teacher and making him feel helpless.

  • The film ends with the coach surrendering his power not because he was defeated, but because he chose compassion over command.

In both, the adult starts with all the power. But only in the film is that power transformed into trust.


8. Systemic Critique: Private vs. Public

  • Narayan’s setting is domestic—a private tutor, one-on-one. But it represents the larger educational system that focuses on punishment and rote learning.

  • The film is set in a government training institute, showing systemic neglect of children with special needs—insufficient resources, staff with no sensitivity training, and a performance-based culture.

Both stories expose flaws in systems, but the film goes deeper into institutional critique.


9. Ending and Message

  • The story ends with no change in character, no learning—just a twist of irony that leaves the reader amused but uncomfortable.

  • The movie ends with the students winning a match and the coach emotionally overwhelmed. He admits that he has learned more from these children than from his years of training.

While Narayan's story says "Look how foolish we are," the film says, "Look how much better we could be."


 10. Emotional Impact

  • The story hits the mind—it makes you think critically about education, pride, and punishment.

  • The movie touches the heart—it makes you cry, reflect, and even act differently. You walk out wanting to be a better teacher, parent, or friend.


Final Reflection

In the end, both Crime and Punishment and Sitare Zameen Par offer valuable mirrors—one reflects the rigidity of the past, the other offers a hopeful direction for the future. Where Narayan uses humor to expose how pride fails education, Sitare Zameen Par invites the audience into a world where change is possible—if we listen, slow down, and care.

These two works together remind us that every child is not a problem to fix, but a person to understand.


Both works thus complement each other—one shows what goes wrong when fear dominates, the other what goes right when empathy leads.


4. What did I feel or learn after watching the movie?

Watching Sitare Zameen Par was an overwhelming experience. It not only moved me emotionally but also made me rethink what it means to be a student, a teacher, or even a human being.

I learned that:

  • Children don’t fail. It’s the system that often fails to reach them.

  • True teaching is not about making a child conform, but about helping them discover their own light.

  • Punishment may create fear, but only love creates change.









And Watching Sitare Zameen Par was not just emotional—it was transformative. The movie teaches that every child deserves to shine, no matter how different their abilities might be. One of the most heartwarming scenes is when the Gulshan Bachchon team, despite losing the competition, rushes to hug and cheer the winning team. This moment radiates pure humanity—it’s not about trophies or medals, it’s about emotional victory. They clap, hug, and even lift the other kids with joy, showing that true winners are those who can celebrate others' success with a full heart.

This scene especially moved me. It reminded me that compassion and empathy are the real goals of education. The way both teams merge in celebration, dancing and smiling together, breaks down every label of “special” and “normal.” It was a celebration not just of victory—but of inclusion, acceptance, and unity. It teaches us that life is not a competition to beat others, but a journey where we uplift each other.

The most unforgettable moment for me was when the teacher presents the child’s artwork in front of the entire school. It is not just an academic moment—it is a moment of emotional liberation. The boy’s face, once filled with fear and shame, now lights up with pride.

It made me think: How many such children are around us—unnoticed, unheard, unappreciated?

The film reminded me to listen more, judge less, and always look beyond appearances. Whether in classrooms, homes, or friendships, people carry silent struggles. A little kindness can be life-changing.


Conclusion: From Red Marks to Rising Stars


➡️   Sitare Zameen Par and Crime and Punishment both hold a mirror to our society’s treatment of children, especially in educational spaces. Where R.K. Narayan’s story shows the failure of old-school discipline, the movie shows the power of progressive, empathetic teaching.

The real beauty of Sitare Zameen Par lies in its belief that every child is a star, even if they don’t shine in exams. The job of adults—parents, teachers, society—is not to extinguish them with expectations, but to help them glow with guidance.

“Woh har bachcha jo padhai mein peeche hai, shayad kisi aur raaste se duniya ko aage le jaane wala hai.”
(“That child who lags behind in studies might be the one to lead the world in another way.”)



References :


    Dsouza, N., & Parihar, N. S. (2025, May 16). Sitaare zameen par Trailer out: Aamir Khan coaches a team of ‘Normal’ kids to victory. Social Kandura. Retrieved July 21, 2025, from https://socialkandura.com/sitaare-zameen-par-trailer-out-aamir-khan-coaches-a-team-of-normal-kids-to-victory/?hl=en-US
     

      Hub, W. (2025, June 21). What sitaare Zameen Par teaches about neurodiversity. WellnessHub. Retrieved July 20, 2025, from https://www.mywellnesshub.in/blog/sitaare-zameen-par-neurodiversity-lesson-parents/


    Prasanna, R. S. (Director). (2025, June 20). Sitare Zameen Par. Amir Khan Production.


   The Malgudi Days : R.K. Narayan : Free download, borrow, and streaming : Internet Archive. (1943, January 7). Internet Archive. Retrieved July 21, 2025, from https://archive.org/details/the-malgudi-days/mode/2up






Thank you.... 😊





No comments:

Post a Comment

Assignment Paper No. 205 – A : Cultural Studies

  Hell o Readers!  Greetings, this blog is based on an Assignment writing of Paper No. 205 22410 – A : Cultural Studies  And I have chose to...